Oh just for fun, and because RAM all but begs for it, but here’s how I skinned this cat for Aux.Out. 

01. Bring Life Back To Music  –> “You Are Beautiful” by Chic
02. The Game Of Love  –> “No Ordinary Love” by Sade
03.  Giorgio by Moroder  –> “Elektric City” by Chick Corea Elektric Band
04. Within  –> “Music of the Night” from the musical Phantom of the Opera
05. Instant Crush  –> “A Real Hero” by College
06. Lose Yourself To Dance  –> “House Party” by Fred Wesley
07. Touch  –> “One Night in Bankok” from the musical Chess written by ABBA + “Round and Round” by Ariel Pink’s Haunted Graffiti
08. Get Lucky  –> “Fantasy” by Earth Wind & Fire
09. Beyond  –> “I Keep Forgettin’ (Every Time You’re Near)” by Michael McDonald
10. Motherboard  –> “Mercy Street” by Herbie Hancock (orig. by Peter Gabriel)
11. Fragments of Time  –> “Glamour Profession” by Steely Dan
12. Doin’ It Right  –> “Last Night At The Jetty” by Panda Bear
13. Contact  –> “Human After All” by Daft Punk

(Source: Spotify)

You like sad songs sung by men with low voices, Billy? Here’s a buncha bummer jams by bartitones for when you feel like going there. I made this list with some of my favorites in mind, and I’m sure I will add more when/if I recall them. C’mon get bummed.

(Source: Spotify)

Top half of a coyote 

For each apparent phenomenon devise at least six plausible explanations, each one of which indeed explains the phenomenon. There are probably sixty, but if you devise six this will sensitize you to how many there may yet be and prevent you from focusing in on the first thing that “sounds right” as The Truth. Disciplining yourself to think in this way — maybe this is happening, but on the other hand, maybe that is happening — keeps you from being rigid in your thinking, which in my tradition is considered to be extraordinarily counterproductive.

Now you assign a personal probability factor to each explanation. This probably factor will be based on your personal experience. This is all you have to go on. Someone else’s probability factor will be different their experience is different. This is OK. It is inevitable. Each of us have different experience, therefore, different estimates of probability. 

The personal probably factor can never be 100% — and never, never 0%

This is taken from the book Three Strands of a Braid by Pamela Underwood, a book my mom was reading about the psychology of learning. She has a lot of these kinds of books, some more new-agey than others. After years as a teacher, she now works as a professional mentor (like, certified) and facilitates workshops for educators and professionals on, essentially, teaching and learning.

But I really like this quote and this way of thinking, even if it’s a little didactic or it’s the essence of the DFW This is water” commencement speech reduced to a maxim. Not a shabby maxim. 

I mean look, hasn’t criticism aways been inextricably tied to self-promotion since the dawn of seeking approval from your peers/audience? Unless you’re stuck as a vassal in some feudalistic society (sorry :/ ) it’s preternatural to want to rise above your station in life — especially when you think you deserve it. That’s that pejorative thirst! We’ve always been thirsty… everyone is thirsty. No one is not thirsty. Those especially parched are those who believe, rightfully or not, that they deserve a louder voice than what they have.

We just have different ways of showing it. Some are cagey and caked in irony and self-reflexive insecurity, and some are very direct and very loud. But the difference between asking Rick Ross to follow you on Twitter so you can DM him this beat and writing this here blog post is negligible — all cut from the same cloth. 

The success of your self-promotion and criticism is just more apparent now that you can quantify it via social media: Likes, Favs, RTs, RBs, Up-votes, whatever. And especially within the echo chamber of Twitter, the nagging sense that someone’s “smart take” is coming from a place of Branding and not Cultural Consideration is always there. And calling out someone’s self-promotion or “thirst” on a social media platform creates this ironic feedback loop that just makes me wince. 

Even Ayesha Siddiqi’s great piece, which touches on the connection between self-promotion and criticism, invites this hall-of-mirrors involuted reading of who’s really promoting who. You can find, couched in her wonderful essay about how we consume abuse in pop culture, elements of self-promotion. It’s inescapable and it’s always there if you want to look for it.

Do some people put an emphasis on their own brand over their own ideas? Yeah! But isn’t it a sliding scale that we’re all on, and we’ve always been on? With the sheer noise of social media coupled with my generation who really feels they deserve it, sometimes people want more amplification. “Can you hear what I have to say and what I believe in because it’s very important to me!” So easy to hate on, but that’s its best defense mechanism: If you critique the self-obsessed desire to be important, you inherently get sucked into the vortex of “No, listen to what *I*have to say.” (Which is maybe why a lot of the tired essays on the Me-Generation Millennials fall flat because they often miss the point:  They attack a person when their selfish desires are amplified through technology and that is the real crux of the noise the olds are complaining about) 

It’s super loud in here, and Social Media often feels like Steve Carrell’s convicted admission of utter confusion from Anchorman. And we are dubious, so dubious of people’s intentions — but perhaps it’s better to draw focus on the actual criticism and not reasons behind it.

But we’re all out here just trying to get someone to turn up our mic, right? 

A few of mine

Sunday morning feels like the right time to dig deep into some Moby Grape. This was the first song that turned me on to them, which tells a very sad, detailed, and surreal story just three minutes.

A journey from:

And I’m so grateful
That I’m still willing
To have her home

to

Now I’m so grateful
I’m no longer willing
To have her home

is only separated by three little stanzas. A sudden change of heart? A jump-cut years into the future? I don’t know. There’s so much life that happens in these three minutes. The words he choses sound so dutiful and detached, like reading a mantra from a self-help book, but the music underneath is just bath-water warm.

Something about that dichotomy sounding like he feels the opposite of what he’s saying, like he’s completely lost and just trying to convince himself that this is the best course of action — even though it always seems like the wrong choice.

Something about the word “willing” being stuffed with so much sadness and resignation — pushing against forces he can’t control, trying to do the right thing despite your impulses. It’s such a selfless, passive aggressive word. 

And It’s one of the only songs where I would count that ride cymbal as being just as crucial as the lyrics.

Of the many lessons I learned as a kid — from, “Why would you mow the whole lawn and then not cut the grass behind the shed you can see there’s grass there, right?” to, “Why would you wash the entire car but not wash the bugs off the bumper you can see there’s bugs there, right?” — I hang on to a very familiar and worthy saw that never seems to expire no matter how rudimentary it sounds: “Never be afraid to ask a question.”

Be the kid in the class who asks too many questions, and if something doesn’t make sense to you, don’t give up, just ask someone who you think might know. Ask someone you may not even know! Commiserate in the deep abyss of the unknown with a new pal — you already have something in common. There’s knowledge all around us in the abyss, if not new facts then new ways to perceive and interpret the things we’ve come to believe are facts. Pardon its mawkishness, but a favorite quote of mine goes, “Of course it’s scary to give up what we know, but the abyss is where newness lives. Great ideas and inventions miraculously appear in the space of not knowing.”

This ideology works well — in theory. Most of the time if you ask someone a question, they will give you an answer. When you start to factor in variables like who this person is and what kind of question you are asking, and why are you asking it, or why are you asking me, that’s when the simple Q&A machine can break down.

Sometimes I email questions to other writers and critics. Collegues, friends, people I look up to, people from Twitter or Tumblr. They’re usually questions about complicated issues that I have a hard time parsing by myself; usually about some sort of rap narrative that I can’t follow, or about trying to empathize and contextualize the Drill scene in Chicago. I emailed Meaghan once and she gave the most thoughtful, kind, and wicked smart response to what was probably a pretty bone-headed and ignorant question about Chief Keef and Lil Reese. I was humbled.

Every time I emailed someone a question, be it just a “Thoughts on this?” or “This sucks right just tell me it sucks b/c I’m abt to set everything on fire” to people I talk to every day or to people I hardly know, a dialogue occurs. Information is exchanged, and at the very least I come away feeling like I conquered a fear of not knowing via a Vg-Ex P2P connection.

Conversely if I’m ever on the A side and not the Q side, I, to be perfectly honest, feel pretty good about myself, both ego- and charity-wise. Tumblr has an ask feature and people answer them all the time, anons and followers, thousands of Q&As are happening right now, IRC and IRL, and my oh my are most of those going along just splendidly.

I failed at one of these Q&As this weekend. I emailed someone I had met all of once, who was gracious enough to lend me their time about a particularly complicated issue, and things broke down. The conversation did not end with either of us being particularly happy with one another. I take full blame for what happened. I won’t go into the the details of the exchange suffice it to say, It was very upsetting for me and for this other person, but I truly believe we both handled the situation to the best of our abilities.

Then I got to thinkin’ about this ideology I hold so dear and a certain topical, egomaniacal, and insufferable pied piper who trades on the Art of Asking and my heart just sank. Am I her, standing on an old milk crate with a fucking daisy in my hand batting my eyes at people begging them for information? I imagined critics calling me a huckster, here to con the commodity of information out of people. (I fully disclose that if you donate your knowledge, all can give in return is a hearty thanks and an offer to foot a hypothetical lunch bill!) I imagined critics saying I’m privileged enough to have the ability to ask other people for knowledge. I imagined critics informing me that I could probably DIM without asking anyone, like thousands of people with a cursory understanding of Google do every day. No one does this. Figure it out. I didn’t do this. I never just asked anyone for their time. We objectively do not need each other as much as we used to, so that when someone does ask a question, a perfectly valid response is: LMGTFY.

So what’s the value we assign to information that we impart to other people that does not offer us any kind of money, or likes, or favorites, or retweets in return? Is this somehow more valuable knowing that the time spent on this and the bytes processed IRC and IRL will, ostensibly, offer you very little to nothing in exchange?

Do you text that special someone your best jokes, or do you tweet them instead?

If anyone wants to help to answer these questions to the best of their abilities please hit me up. First round’s on me next time.

Sorrow everywhere. Slaughter everywhere. If babies
are not starving someplace, they are starving
somewhere else. With flies in their nostrils.
But we enjoy our lives because that’s what God wants.
Otherwise the mornings before summer dawn would not
be made so fine. The Bengal tiger would not
be fashioned so miraculously well. The poor women
at the fountain are laughing together between
the suffering they have known and the awfulness
in their future, smiling and laughing while somebody
in the village is very sick. There is laughter
every day in the terrible streets of Calcutta,
and the women laugh in the cages of Bombay.
If we deny our happiness, resist our satisfaction,
we lessen the importance of their deprivation.
We must risk delight. We can do without pleasure,
but not delight. Not enjoyment. We must have
the stubbornness to accept our gladness in the ruthless
furnace of this world. To make injustice the only
measure of our attention is to praise the Devil.
If the locomotive of the Lord runs us down,
we should give thanks that the end had magnitude.
We must admit there will be music despite everything.
We stand at the prow again of a small ship
anchored late at night in the tiny port
looking over to the sleeping island: the waterfront
is three shuttered cafés and one naked light burning.
To hear the faint sound of oars in the silence as a rowboat
comes slowly out and then goes back is truly worth
all the years of sorrow that are to come.
A most wonderful and very based poem by Jack Gilbert that was delivered to me today.